學術論文是某一學術課題在實驗性、理論性或預測性上具有的新的科學研究成果或創(chuàng)新見解和知識的科學記錄，或是某種已知原理應用于實際上取得新進展的科學總結，用以提供學術會議上宣讀、交流、討論或學術刊物上發(fā)表，或用作其他用途的書面文件。 在社會科學領域，人們通常把表達科研成果的論文稱為學術論文。 具有四大特點：①學術性 ②科學性 ③創(chuàng)造性 ④理論性

英信翻譯公司是一家專業(yè)翻譯服務機構，我們專注于學術論文翻譯，對于學術論文翻譯我們不僅要求翻譯語言精準，還要在專業(yè)術語上達到高級法律級別以上的專業(yè)水準，我們的學術論文翻譯譯員都是經(jīng)驗豐富的法律類譯員并長期從事翻譯工作，翻譯后由我們的翻譯項目經(jīng)理或資深的審譯員進行多次的審查和校對，以確保用詞嚴謹，表達清楚，邏輯性強，務必使得學術論文翻譯不會產(chǎn)生歧義。

學術論文翻譯服務范圍：法學學術論文翻譯、科技學術論文翻譯、醫(yī)學學術論文翻譯、經(jīng)濟學術論文計算機學術論文翻譯、化工學術論文翻譯、管理學術論文翻譯、材料學術論文翻譯、計算機學術論文翻譯等。

學術論文翻譯語種：英語翻譯，日語翻譯，法語翻譯，西班牙語翻譯，阿拉伯語翻譯等60多個語種，學術論文翻譯人員20余名。

摘要：作為1980年代“文化：中國與世界”編委會主編的甘陽，他從1980年代至今一以貫之的是關注文化的思路。本文順此“文化”視角來梳理他近三十年來思路中的不變與變化。不變的是他將文化放置于“古今中西”之爭的架構下的討論方式；最根本的變化則是由哲學到政治的轉變，此政治是原初性的現(xiàn)實的政治世界。如此的對于政治的理解又是與質(zhì)疑全球性普世化的特殊主義聯(lián)系一起，這同時也使他對于“古今中西”之爭的理解深化，其中的張力得以展開。他由此提出“通三統(tǒng)”說，再進而以社會主義、文化保守主義在排序上優(yōu)先于自由主義，而社會主義又優(yōu)先于文化保守主義。由于甘陽個人在當代中國思想學術界的某種特殊位置，通過對他個人的解讀，自然也試圖理解中國思想學術界晚近三十年來的變遷及其背后內(nèi)在的歷史動力，理解中國知識分子重返政治以及何謂真正的政治成熟的問題。

Abstract: Gan Yang, who used to be the chief editor of "Culture: China and World" that was published in the 1980s, has been consistently concerned with the question --------the train of thought on culture.  From this perspective of "culture", this paper shall focus on his thought on two fronts: those unchanged and changed. What remains changeless is that he put culture in the framework of "ancient time, modern time, China and west" debate to talk about culture. The most fundamental alteration is the change from philosophy to politics. The latter refers to the realistic political world. Such a understanding of politics is related to particularism that questions global universalism. It, in the meantime, deepens his comprehension of the debate about ""ancient time, modern time, China and west". Therefore, he put forward "Tongsantong" theory and proceed to sort order for socialism, cultural conservatism and liberalism. And he put socialism ahead of cultural conservatism, with liberalism at the bottom of the list. Due to his special position in the realm of thought in China, he attempts to comprehend the changes that took place in the thought circle of China over the last 30 years, as well as the inherent historical impetus behind it. Besides, he also trys hard to probe into the fact that Chinese intellectuals returned to the political arena and what is political maturity in the real sense.